Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cortez

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

KLEIN, J.:

¶ 1 Defendant Hinginio Cortez appeals from the judgment of sentence following conviction for two counts of Possession with Intent to Deliver (PWID) a controlled substance. We deny the motion for a new trial based on improper consolidation of charges on the two separate occasions, but we grant the motion to vacate the judgment of sentence and remand for re-sentencing.

¶ 2 Cortez raises two issues for our review: (1) whether the trial court erred in consolidating two separate PWID charges *1047for trial; and (2) whether the trial court abused its discretion in sentencing Cortez to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MouzonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. ShivelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. McAleerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. NatividadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MartsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. MartsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. Parmelee, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2005
  4. Commonwealth v. CortezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API