Commonwealth v. McAleer
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIGRO, Justice.
In this appeal, Appellant Sean Patrick McAleer argues that the calendar court judge 1 abused his discretion when he denied Appellant’s request for a continuance. We agree and therefore reverse.
In October of 1996, the Commonwealth charged Appellant with simple assault, false imprisonment and related charges. 2 The district magistrate in Fallsington, Pennsylvania, scheduled a preliminary hearing for March 18, 1997, at which time Richard Hoy, Esquire, represented Appellant. 3 At the conclusion of that hearing, Appellant was bound over for trial in the Court of Common Pleas…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Mielcuszny Et Ux. v. Rosol (Et Ux.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Commonwealth v. NovakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth v. ChambersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AntidormiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. RadeckiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. CooperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. MontalvoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.