Legal Opinion

Romero v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 5, 2005No. PD-0911-04PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeller, P.J.

in which PRICE, WOMACK, JOHNSON, KEASLER, HERVEY and COCHRAN, JJ„ joined.

The question before us is whether the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses was violated when a witness testified in disguise. Although this is a very close issue, and one undecided by the United States Supreme Court, we answer that question “yes” and affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

I. BACKGROUND

Appellant was indicted for aggravated assault.2 On the morning of trial, Cesar Hiran Vasquez, one of the State’s key witnesses, arrived at the courthouse but refused to enter the courtroom to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Hector Morales v. Christopher Artuz, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. Romero v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Balderas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. Coronado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  3. in Re Commitment of Lester Winkle, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2014
  4. State v. ParkerNebraska Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. London v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API