Legal Opinion

Romero v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided May 18, 2004No. 06-03-00072-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice MORRISS.

When subpoenaed State’s witness, Cesar Hiran Vasquez, appeared at Israel G. Romero’s aggravated assault trial wearing dark sunglasses, a baseball cap pulled low over his eyes, and a jacket with an upturned collar, leaving visible only Vasquez’s ears, the tops of his cheeks, and the bridge of his nose, the trial court, over defense counsel’s objection, allowed Vasquez to testify in the “disguise.” We must decide whether that violated Romero’s rights under the Confrontation and Due Process Clauses. We hold it did.

Romero was indicted for aggravated assault…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  2. State v. ParkerNebraska Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Jones v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Andrew Colby Livingston v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2020
  5. Ex parte Emiliano Rodriguez PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALSSupreme Court of Alabama · 2023

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API