Legal Opinion

London v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 8, 2017No. 01-13-00441-CRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Michael Massengale, Justice

The sole issue in this appeal is an as-applied constitutional challenge to the imposition of statutory court costs for witness subpoenas in a criminal case. The appellant contends that his constitutional rights to compulsory process to secure -favorable witnesses and to confront adverse witnesses1 were violated by a statute which requires a defendant, upon conviction of a crime, to pay “$5 for summoning a witness.”2

The appellant pleaded guilty before trial. He has failed to identify any witness he would have called but for the prospect of postjudgmeht…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ruben Lee Allen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2018
  2. James Larry Merrit v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. Johnny Melchor MacIas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2017
  4. Eugene v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. Castello v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API