London v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Michael Massengale, Justice
The sole issue in this appeal is an as-applied constitutional challenge to the imposition of statutory court costs for witness subpoenas in a criminal case. The appellant contends that his constitutional rights to compulsory process to secure -favorable witnesses and to confront adverse witnesses1 were violated by a statute which requires a defendant, upon conviction of a crime, to pay “$5 for summoning a witness.”2
The appellant pleaded guilty before trial. He has failed to identify any witness he would have called but for the prospect of postjudgmeht…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ruben Lee Allen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2018
- James Larry Merrit v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Johnny Melchor MacIas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2017
- Eugene v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Castello v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.