Legal Opinion
In re Mochel
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided December 29, 1972No. Patent Appeal No. 8768PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals sustaining the rejection of claims 1-3 of appellant’s application for “Strengthened Glass Article”, serial No. 550,121, filed May 16, 1966, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Republic of South Africa patent No. 62/2352 to Garfinkel.
The Invention
The invention relates to glass articles having a base composition of either sodium aluminosilicate (Na20-Al203-Si02) or sodium zirconosilicate (Na20-ZrC>2-Si02) chemically strengthened by an ion exchange reaction wherein sodium ions in a surface layer of the glass…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Application of Philip S. Fay and Fred J. FoxCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Arness v. FranksCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
- In re SebekCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Application of Robert B. Egbert and Alfred SafferCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cornejo-Ortega v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- In re ReuterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- In re ReuterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Sodexomagic, LLC v. Drexel Univ.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Flink/Vulcan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.