Legal Opinion
Flink/Vulcan v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 17, 2004No. 99-1005CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Plaintiff Flink/Vulean, at the time of the incidents relating to this claim, was a firm under contract with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), to provide habitability inspections of damaged residences located in declared disaster areas. This claim arises as a result of the deactivation of Project Notification 8 issued to Flink/Vulean for inspection work relating to the Loma Prieta earthquake in California. Originally this case was assigned to the Honorable Lynn J. Bush. The case was reassigned to this judge in July, 2004.
At the times relevant to…
2Cases cited91 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- M.A. DeAtley Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Strickland v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
- Rma Engineering S.A.R.L v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018