In re Sebek
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Lane, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals sustaining the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-3 of appellant’s application1 on the ground of obviousness (35 USC 103) over certain prior art. We reverse.
The invention is in the field of chemical synthesis of beta-carotene, a precursor of vitamin A. It had previously been known that beta-carotene could be produced by certain micro-organisms using an aqueous fermentation medium containing citrus molasses, a product obtained from whole citrus peel. Appellant contends that in the prior art processes, the level of citrus…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Application of Philip S. Fay and Fred J. FoxCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re MayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- In re AltenpohlCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- In re SchneiderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- In re MochelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- In re DollingerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.