Legal Opinion

In re Sebek

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided August 31, 1972No. 8631PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lane, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals sustaining the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-3 of appellant’s application1 on the ground of obviousness (35 USC 103) over certain prior art. We reverse.

The invention is in the field of chemical synthesis of beta-carotene, a precursor of vitamin A. It had previously been known that beta-carotene could be produced by certain micro-organisms using an aqueous fermentation medium containing citrus molasses, a product obtained from whole citrus peel. Appellant contends that in the prior art processes, the level of citrus…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Application of Philip S. Fay and Fred J. FoxCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re MayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  2. In re AltenpohlCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  3. In re SchneiderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  4. In re MochelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  5. In re DollingerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API