Legal Opinion

Eason Ex Rel. Eason v. Dew

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1956No. 249PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

The facts agreed negative rather than support plaintiff’s allegations as to the existence of a contract between plaintiff and Dew. In this respect, there is a material variance between the allegation and proof. There can be no recovery except on the case made by the complaint. Andrews v. Bruton, 242 N.C. 93, 86 S.E. 2d 786; Manley v. News Co., 241 N.C. 455, 85 S.E. 2d 672.

Are the facts alleged sufficiently established by the facts agreed to warrant plaintiff’s recovery of $756.00 or any amount by reason of the provisions of G.S. 44-1 and G.S. 44-41? When litigants submit a cause on agreed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Andrews v. BrutonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. GENERAL AIR CONDITIONING COMPANY v. DouglassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Brown v. . WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Edwards v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Montague v. . MialSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wolf Corporation v. LouisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  2. North Carolina Board of Pharmacy v. LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Lowe's of Fayetteville, Inc. v. QuigleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Ahoskie Production Credit Association v. WhedbeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. NCNB Financial Services, Inc. v. Stevcoknit, Inc. (In Re Stevcoknit, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API