Eason Ex Rel. Eason v. Dew
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
The facts agreed negative rather than support plaintiff’s allegations as to the existence of a contract between plaintiff and Dew. In this respect, there is a material variance between the allegation and proof. There can be no recovery except on the case made by the complaint. Andrews v. Bruton, 242 N.C. 93, 86 S.E. 2d 786; Manley v. News Co., 241 N.C. 455, 85 S.E. 2d 672.
Are the facts alleged sufficiently established by the facts agreed to warrant plaintiff’s recovery of $756.00 or any amount by reason of the provisions of G.S. 44-1 and G.S. 44-41? When litigants submit a cause on agreed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Andrews v. BrutonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- GENERAL AIR CONDITIONING COMPANY v. DouglassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Brown v. . WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Edwards v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Montague v. . MialSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wolf Corporation v. LouisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- North Carolina Board of Pharmacy v. LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Lowe's of Fayetteville, Inc. v. QuigleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Ahoskie Production Credit Association v. WhedbeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- NCNB Financial Services, Inc. v. Stevcoknit, Inc. (In Re Stevcoknit, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.