Legal Opinion
Bowman v. Jack's Auto Sales
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 27, 1999No. AC 17376PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’CONNELL, C. J.
This is the plaintiffs appeal from the decision of the compensation review board (board). The plaintiff asserts that the board (1) improperly held that he could not receive wholly separate permanent partial disability awar ds for both his hands and the skin on his hands and (2) exceeded its authority in reversing the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner). We affirm the decision of the board.
The genesis of this appeal was an October 26, 1977 incident in which a battery exploded in the plaintiffs hands. The plaintiff, Richard Bowman, and his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Fair v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Adzima v. UAC/Norden DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Enquist v. General DatacomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Czeplicki v. Fafnir Bearing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bowman v. Jack's Auto SalesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999