Legal Opinion
Valois of America, Inc. v. Risdon Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 23, 1997No. 3:95 CV 1850(AHN)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON VALOIS S.A.’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER THAT DISCOVERY BE TAKEN UNDER HAGUE CONVENTION
MARGOLIS, United States Magistrate Judge.
On August 31, 1995, plaintiff, Valois of America, Inc. [“Valois America”] filed this *345action against defendant Risdon Corporation [“Risdon”]. (Dkt. # 1). Valois America seeks a declaratory judgment that Risdon’s U.S. Patent No. 4,773,553 [the “ ’553 Patent”] is invalid and is not infringed by Valois America’s Seal Tight pump assembly (Count One). Valois America also alleges that Ris-don’s accusations of infringement constitute misuse of the ’553 Patent…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shirley Small v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. United States District Court for the Southern District of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Rich v. KIS California, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1988
- Hudson v. Hermann Pfauter Gmbh & Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1987
- Benton Graphics v. Uddeholm Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re: Automotive Refinishing Paint Antitrust Litigation Basf Ag and Basf Coatings AgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Strauss v. Credit Lyonnais, S.A.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- In re Automotive Refinishing Paint Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Bodner v. ParibasDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
- Tulip Computers International B v. v. Dell Computer Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.