Legal Opinion

Chilberg v. Parsons

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1919No. 15490PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Allen, J., entered February 26, 1919, upon the verdict of a jury, rendered in favor of the defendant, in an action for damages sustained through an automobile collision.

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of respondent, defendant below, based upon a collision between a Pierce-Arrow automobile driven by appellant’s son, and a Locomobile driven by respondent’s chauffeur. The collision occurred at the intersection of Thirtieth avenue and East Alder street, in the city of Seattle, each of which streets is sixty feet wide between property lines, and has a twenty-four foot paved roadway between the curb lines. At the time in question, appellant’s car was being driven in a westerly direction along East Alder street, and respondent’s car was being driven…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Herrett v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Fahey v. CrottyMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Coffey v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Kangley v. RogersWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Adams v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Breimon v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  2. Brooks v. HerdWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Meyers v. MeyersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  4. Rossier v. PayneWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Breimon v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API