Brooks v. Herd
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
This is an action by respondent to recover from appellant, a drugless healer, damages for his reckless and negligent treatment of a venereal disease with which respondent was then suffering. Appellant was employed about September 13, 1924, upon, what respondent alleged in his complaint and testified at the trial was a contract to cure respondent for the agreed price of sixty or seventy dollars. Appellant treated respondent from the date of the employment until about January 28, 1925, when, according to the allegation and testimony of respondent, appellant pronounced respondent cured and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gadbury v. BleitzWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Corcoran v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Kneass v. Cremation Society of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Wilcox v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- State v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Watson v. HockettWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. LydonWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Dunnington v. Virginia Mason Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 2017
- Dick v. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- State v. BrubakerWashington Supreme Court · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.