Foltz v. Conrad Realty Co.
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Page county in a proceeding by motion for a judgment for damages. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.
1Opinion of the CourtSaunders, J.
This is a controversy concerning commissions on a sale of land by the Conrad Realty Company for R. P. Foltz, a citizen of Page county, in this State. The sale is alleged to have been made pursuant to the authority of a written contract between the parties, whereby it was agreed that the realty company should offer for sale for the plaintiff in error (defendant below) a tract of about twelve acres, *499situated in the suburbs of Stanley, a small village in above county. The contract provided that the realty company should put the property in first class condition at its own expense, thoroughly…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brackenridge v. Claridge & PayneTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Love v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Cheatham v. YarbroughTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
- Wright v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
- Peet v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Morris v. PeytonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
- Best v. KelleyWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Epes' Administrator v. HardawaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
- Hopkins v. LeCatoSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
- Southern Trust Co. v. BunchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.