Legal Opinion

Cosby v. Pool

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1971No. Docket 11096PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, P. J.

Defendants stipulate that the facts presented in plaintiffs’ brief are accurate except for a few exceptions. This Court therefore adopts those facts, taking notice of the exceptions and clarifications stated in defendants’ brief.

A jury awarded plaintiffs a negligence judgment against John D. Pool in the amount of $200,000 on behalf of plaintiff Kenneth W. Cosby and in the amount of $6,000 on behalf of plaintiff Cecilia V. Cosby, his wife, with the judgment further providing for interest in the total sum of $33,333 on behalf of Mr. Cosby and $1,000 on behalf of Mrs. Cosby. This represented…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lahti v. FosterlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Hansen-Snyder Co. v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Richmond Mortgage & Loan Corp. v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Ballog v. Knight Newspapers, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Wood v. LovettSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Paul J. Glick v. White Motor Company v. North American Rockwell Corp., (Third Party Defendant)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  2. Denham v. BedfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Celina Mutual Insurance v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Matich v. Modern Research Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Dittus v. GeymanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API