Legal Opinion

Bethea v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 23, 1991No. 2305PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order granting appellees’ (Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan and The Travelers) motion for summary judgment and dismissing appellant’s complaint asking for uninsured motorist benefits under the assigned claims plan. Appellant raises one issue, whether the spouse of the registered owner of an uninsured motor vehicle is entitled to benefits under the Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan.

Appellant was driving an uninsured vehicle when the vehicle she was driving was struck by another vehicle which was also uninsured. Appellant filed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. DiFlorido v. DiFloridoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Allen v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. DeMichele v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Simon v. SimonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Elder v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Shipley v. Tax Claim Bureau of Delaware CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Habbyshaw v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Alberts v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1992
  5. Habbyshaw v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API