Legal Opinion

Simon v. Simon

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1981No. 1010PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

Appellant asks us to reverse the decision of the trial court to divide all jointly held personal property which existed before any appropriation by either party. We hold the trial court acted properly and affirm.

Dennis Simon raises four issues on appeal. First, were the trial court’s calculations in error? Second, did the trial court err in not granting appellant’s full counterclaim? Third, did the trial court err in refusing to consider the Protection from Abuse Order obtained by appellee as evidence of removal from home. And, fourth, did the trial court err in its…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stauffer v. StaufferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Stemniski v. StemniskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Vento v. VentoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Cohen v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Hengst v. HengstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marinello v. MarinelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Bethea v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims PlanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Hairston v. HairstonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Marinello v. MarinelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Miller v. Miller, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API