Legal Opinion

Alberts v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided December 15, 1992No. 3050Published

1Opinion of the Court

HERRON, J.,

This court denies plaintiff wife’s claim for motorist benefits suffered in a motor vehicle accident while driving her husband’s uninsured vehicle titled in his name because she is an “owner” of that vehicle.

BACKGROUND1

This case arises out of a motor vehicle accident which occurred on January 20, 1990, in Philadelphia. In the course of that accident, plaintiff Bridget Alberts, while operating an uninsured motor vehicle titled in her husband’s name, suffered injuries. Alberts filed a claim for uninsured motorists’ benefits which was subsequently denied by Constitution State Service…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bethea v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims PlanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API