McKeon v. Sambrano
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
A summary statement of a few pertinent facts will be conducive to a proper understanding of the questions of law presented by these several motions. It appears that the appellant at one time had pending herein five appeals from as many orders entered by the trial court in this foreclosure proceeding. One of these several appeals was from the judgment and decree of foreclosure while the remaining four were from orders made and entered after said judgment. Upon the calling of the December calendar of this court the respondent made a motion, upon enumerated grounds, for the dismissal…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Locke Paddon v. Locke PaddonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Heinlen v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Batchoff v. Butte Pacific Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
- Ramsay v. RodgersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Beckett v. StuartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Douglas v. JanisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Labarthe v. McRaeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Steele v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Traders Credit Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Caldwell v. GeldreichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.