Domer Scaramucci and William A. Moore v. Dresser Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge.
Domer Scaramucci, owner of patents 3,266,384 (hereinafter ’384) and 3,266,-386 (hereinafter ’386) and William Moore, d/b/a Bell Rubber Company, exclusive licensee of Scaramucci under these patents, instituted this suit claiming that Dresser Industries has and continues to infringe the aforesaid patents. A second cause of action for unfair competition is based on allegations that Dresser Industries illegally delayed issuance of patents ’384 and ’386 by instituting interference proceedings subsequent to the latter’s application for a patent on a similar device. Dresser…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- McCullough Tool Co. v. Well Surveys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Admiral Corporation v. Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- The Eimco Corporation v. Peterson Filters and Engineering Company and Komline-Sanderson Engineering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Milgo Electronic Corporation, a Florida Corporation v. United Business Communications, Inc., a Kansas Corporation, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Plastic Container Corporation v. Continental Plastics of Oklahoma, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- True Temper Corporation, and Cross-Appellee v. Cf&i Steel Corporation, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- Louis W. Parker, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Motorola, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Greenberg v. Croydon Plastics Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.