Legal Opinion
Ramirez v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided May 1, 2003No. 03-02-00367-CRPublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LEE YEAKEL, Justice.
Following the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress, appellant Andrew Ramirez pleaded guilty to felony possession of marihuana. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.121(b)(3) (West Supp.2003). The district court sentenced appellant to six months in a state-jail facility. Appellant had moved the court to suppress both an oral statement he made to police and the marihuana obtained when a police officer searched, without a warrant or consent, a closed ice cooler in the appellant’s garage. Appellant appeals only the district court’s denial of his motion…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Keehn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Randolph v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
- Bartlett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
- Badall v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2007
- State v. Ortiz, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.