Legal Opinion
Randolph v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided December 6, 2004No. 05-03-00793-CRPublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice LANG.
Christopher Dean Randolph appeals his conviction, after a bench trial, for driving while intoxicated, claiming error in the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. Appellant brings two issues on appeal: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because the police officer entered appellant’s garage without a warrant, probable cause, or exigent circumstances in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article 1, § 9 of the Texas Constitution; 1 and (2) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Rideout v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Posey v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
- Wingfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- In the Matter of I.L., a Juvenile, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2012
- Jack Theotrice Clark, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2015
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.