Legal Opinion

In Re Doe

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 2006No. 31563PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

130 P.3d 1132 (2006)

142 Idaho 594

In the Interest of Jane DOE, a Child Under Eighteen Years of Age.

State of Idaho, Department of Health and Welfare, Human Services Division, Petitioner-Respondent-Respondent on Appeal,

v.

Jane Roe, Respondent-Appellant-Respondent on Appeal, and

Jane Doe, a child under eighteen years of age, Party in Interest-Appellant on Appeal.

No. 31563.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, January 2006 Term.

February 27, 2006.

Dial, May & Rammell, Chtd., Pocatello, for appellant. Aaron N. Thompson argued.

Honorable Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General, Boise, for respondent State of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dinneen v. FinchIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Doe v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Doe v. RoeIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Donndelinger v. DonndelingerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Dayley v. State, Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Schneider v. SchneiderIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Dorsey v. DorseyIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
  4. DHW v. John DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Re: Termination of Parental RightsIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API