Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1985)

Nebraska Attorney General Reports

Decided April 4, 1985Published

1Opinion of the Court

REQUESTED BY: Senator Don Wesely Nebraska State Legislature 1402 State Capitol Lincoln, NE 68509

Dear Senator Wesely:

This letter is in response to your earlier correspondence in which you requested our opinion as to the constitutionality of LB 578. Specifically, you asked whether LB 578 violates any state or federal constitutional provisions including the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. We have reviewed the bill in question along with various relevant legal authorities. As is discussed below, we have concluded that LB 578 is of suspect constitutional validity.

LB 578 would…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. CottrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Ware & Leland v. Mobile CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Ass'n v. New Mexico Board of PharmacyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Ranger Division, Ryder Truck Lines, Inc. v. BayneNebraska Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API