Legal Opinion
Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Ass'n v. New Mexico Board of Pharmacy
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided July 25, 1974No. 1009PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Appellants seek review of certain regulations adopted by the New Mexico Board of Pharmacy. Our standard of review is found in § 67-26-31 (C), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol.1961, pt. 1, Supp.1973) which states:
s “C. Upon appeal, the court of appeals shall set aside the regulation only if found to be:
“(1) arbitrary, capricious or an abuse of discretion;
“(2) contrary to law; or “(3) against the clear weight of substantial evidence of the record.”
Regulations were adopted by the State Board of Pharmacy pursuant to the Drug and Cosmetic Act, § 54-6-26 et seq., N. M.S.A.1953…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona Ex Rel. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ernest W. Hahn, Inc. v. County AssessorNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- Bokum Resources Corp. v. New Mexico Water Quality Control CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Matter of Protest of MillerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- New Mexico Municipal League, Inc. v. New Mexico Environmental Improvement BoardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- New Mexico Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.