Legal Opinion

Ball v. Hail

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 4, 1938No. 4-5148PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

J. C. Hail and S. M. Casey filed separate suits in the circuit court against Ball and Rider:- Each was seeking to recover damages for injuries suffered in an automobile accident. Each sued for $300, alleging that his automobile had been impaired to that extent, and each recovered a verdict for $275, and consequent judgments were rendered on the said verdicts. The cases were consolidated for trial only.

Appellants’ contentions are: “1st. There is no evidence of negligence on the part of appellant Ball upon which to base a verdict or judgment against either appellant. 2nd. The evidence is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Terry Dairy Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  2. Mullins v. Ritchie Grocer CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. Mo. Pac. Rd. Co., Baldwin, Trustees v. BrewerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  4. Rex Oil Corporation v. CrankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  5. Helena Wholesale Grocery Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bradley v. S. L. Savidge, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Continental Express v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Dunn v. DunnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  4. Ford & Son Sanitary Co. v. RansomSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  5. Rook v. MoseleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API