Legal Opinion
School District v. School District No. 2
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 1947No. Docket No. 39, Calendar No. 43,667PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.
Plaintiff and appellee school district of the city of Birmingham in Oakland county started proceedings to annex to said district the territory of school district No. 5, township' of Bloomfield in said county. The defendant and appellant school district No. 2, Fractional, of said township of Bloomfield and the city of Bloomfield Hills in said county, also *366started proceedings to annex to its district approximately the north half of said district No. 5. Obviously both plaintiff and defendant school districts could not annex to their respective districts the same territory in the north half of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Taylor v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- State of Texas Ex Rel George v. BakerTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- State ex rel. Johnson v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
- Clement v. EverestMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Popenfus v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Helling v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 160Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Common School District No. 1317 v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Pepin v. City of North BendDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1961
- Handley v. CokerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Common School District No. 1317 v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.