Legal Opinion

De Marcos v. Overholser

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 5, 1941No. 7778PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order of the ' District Court discharging a writ of habeas corpus and remanding petitioner (appellant) to the custody of the Superintendent of St. Elizabeths Hospital. At the hearing in this court, petitioner was unrepresented, but at his request he was permitted to argue his petition. Thereafter, we appointed Mr. Frederick A. Ballard, an experienced member of the bar of this court, to represent him. Mr. Ballard very generously undertook this duty, and has discharged it with care and thoroughness, and we have gratefully given his able argument our best consideration.

T…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. De Marcos v. OverholserCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  2. Messick v. Southern Pennsylvania Bus Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Broadstone Realty Corporation v. EvansDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  4. Clark v. SettleDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1962
  5. Lyons v. BordenDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API