Shull v. Walcker

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Clint Walcker appealed from a district court judgment, an order correcting clerical error and denying Walcker’s post-judgment motions, and an order denying Walcker’s motion to vacate the clerical error correction. We affirm, holding the district court did not err when it denied Waleker’s motions for post-judgment relief under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b), and did not err in its judgment finding Walcker liable for damages in the amount of $30,433.40.

I

[¶ 2] In November of 2006, Marian Shull, a land developer in Grand Forks, entered into an agreement with Clint and Noreen…