Anderson v. Baker

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Biron Baker appealed from a district court order denying his motion for reconsideration following an earlier order that held Baker in contempt of court for-failing to reimburse Kim Anderson for their child’s medical expenses and awarding Anderson attorney’s fees. We affirm, concluding the court did not abuse its discretion in denying Baker’s motion. - .

I

[¶ 2] Anderson and Baker have a child together, born in 2010. Under a stipulated judgment entered in June 2011, Baker was required to provide health insurance for the child or reimburse Anderson for her monthly…