Legal Opinion

Follman v. Upper Valley Special Education Unit

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 2000No. 990281PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Dennis Follman appealed from a trial court order denying his motion to reconsider its grant of summary judgment to Upper Valley Special Education Ünit (“Upper Valley”). We hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Follman’s motion. We therefore affirm.

I

[¶ 2] From about June 1989 to June 1995, Follman worked as a special education coordinator for Upper Valley. On June 2, 1995, Follman resigned after submitting a memorandum signed and dated April 3, 1995. In the memorandum, Foll-man asserted he had been subjected to sexual harassment “[djuring the past…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Soentgen v. Quain & Ramstad Clinic, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. First National Bank of Crosby v. BjorgenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Grinaker v. GrinakerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. City of Grand Forks v. ZejdlikNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Hefty v. AldrichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Shull v. WalckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Jaskoviak v. GruverNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Gepner v. Fujicolor Processing, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Jaskoviak v. GruverNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. US Bank National Ass'n v. ArnoldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API