Legal Opinion

Filler v. Bragg

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1997No. Civil 960275PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] James Bragg appealed from the trial court’s order denying his motion to dismiss and his motion to reconsider. Bragg claims the court lacks personal jurisdiction because of improper service of process. Because the trial court abused its discretion, we reverse and remand.

[¶ 2] In August of 1995, James Bragg and Gary Reinhart broke into Alvin and Joan Filler’s (Fillers) garage and stole their 1992 Dodge Caravan, causing damages amounting to $2,966.28 to the van and $289.05 to the garage. In early 1996, the Fillers’ attorney sent a letter to Bragg requesting…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. DuPaulNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Perdue v. ShermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Smith v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Throndset v. HawkensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Hatch v. HatchNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. ChristensenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Austin v. TowneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Shull v. WalckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Desert Partners IV, L.P. v. BensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Wong v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API