Legal Opinion

Matter of McMillan

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 21, 1976No. 7516DC1000PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

It is unchallenged, and the court found, that Shelby and Abe McMillan were “well fed, clothed, and cared for except for their lack of academic instruction.” The court concluded that the children “are neglected within the meaning of G.S. 7A-278(4) on account of the wilful failure and refusal” of their parents “to send said children to school.”

The issue presented in this appeal is whether children whose parents wilfully refuse to allow them to attend school may be “neglected” within the meaning of G.S. 7A-278(4). A child is neglected, as defined in that statute, when he or she…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Tucker v. TuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re BiggersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Peter Duro v. District Attorney, Second Judicial District of North Carolina, North Carolina School Boards Association, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  3. Singer Ex Rel. Singer v. WadmanDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1982
  4. In Re HuberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Matter of ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API