Legal Opinion

Peter Duro v. District Attorney, Second Judicial District of North Carolina, North Carolina School Boards Association, Amicus Curiae

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 14, 1983No. 82-1806PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

K.K. HALL, Circuit Judge:

Peter Duro (Duro) initiated this action against the District Attorney of the Second Judicial District of North Carolina (D.A.) alleging that his religious beliefs were infringed by the North Carolina compulsory school attendance law, N.C.G.S. § 115C-378. The district court entered summary judgment for Duro, from which the D.A. appeals. We find that North Carolina has demonstrated an interest in compulsory ed*97ucation which is of sufficient magnitude to override the religious interest claimed by Duro. Therefore, we reverse.

I

Duro, his wife and six children, five of whom…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Matter of McMillanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Parker v. Town of LexingtonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  2. Combs v. Homer-Center School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  3. Blackwelder v. SafnauerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1988
  4. Care & Protection of CharlesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  5. State v. PatzerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API