Legal Opinion

In Re Huber

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 1, 1982No. 8126DC752PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

Kathy Huber Hazelwood, mother of Bridget Colleen Huber, raises three basic arguments upon appeal. She first contends that the definition of a “neglected juvenile” as contained in N.C.G.S. 7A-517(21) is unconstitutional on its face and as applied to the facts of this case. We do not agree.

The analysis of the law by Judge Vaughn in In re Biggers, 50 N.C. App. 332, 274 S.E.2d 236 (1981), is applicable. In Biggers, the Court was faced with a constitutional challenge to the definition of “neglected child” within the meaning of N.C.G.S. 7A-289.32(2). That statute refers to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Adams v. North Carolina Department of Natural & Economic ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. In Re BurrusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. In Re ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re R.T.W.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Matter of ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. In Re WrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. In re B.D.W.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API