Legal Opinion

Hinds v. Federal Land Bank of New Orleans

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 12, 1939No. 6 Div. 426PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The former appeal in this case was from a ruling on demurrers challenging the necessity for a cross bill. On that appeal it was observed:

“The original bill, filed by the Federal Land Bank of New Orleans, is'a'statutory bill to quiet title to a tract of 87 acres of land, specifically described in the bill, located in the northeast of section 6, township 10, range 2 east, Blount county, Ala., near the town of Summit. * * *
“The only land within the lis pendens_ is the tract of 87 acres described in the bill, and the answer does not set up an independent equity, but asserts a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Dewberry v. Bank of Standing RockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Ivy v. HoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  4. Buchmann Abstract & Investment Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Hinds v. Federal Land Bank of New OrleansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cosby v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Western Grain Company CasesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. Chestang v. Tensaw Land & Timber CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  4. Walthall v. YohnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  5. Woodland Grove Baptist Church v. WOODLAND GROVE COMMUNITY CEMETERY ASSOCIATIONSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API