Legal Opinion
Hinds v. Federal Land Bank of New Orleans
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 12, 1939No. 6 Div. 426PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The former appeal in this case was from a ruling on demurrers challenging the necessity for a cross bill. On that appeal it was observed:
“The original bill, filed by the Federal Land Bank of New Orleans, is'a'statutory bill to quiet title to a tract of 87 acres of land, specifically described in the bill, located in the northeast of section 6, township 10, range 2 east, Blount county, Ala., near the town of Summit. * * *
“The only land within the lis pendens_ is the tract of 87 acres described in the bill, and the answer does not set up an independent equity, but asserts a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Dewberry v. Bank of Standing RockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Ivy v. HoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Buchmann Abstract & Investment Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Hinds v. Federal Land Bank of New OrleansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cosby v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Western Grain Company CasesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Chestang v. Tensaw Land & Timber CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Walthall v. YohnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Woodland Grove Baptist Church v. WOODLAND GROVE COMMUNITY CEMETERY ASSOCIATIONSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.