Legal Opinion

(PC) Gosztyla v. Jenkins

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 22, 2024No. 2:22-cv-01706Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD GOSZTYLA, No. 2:22-cv-01706-DJC-EFB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 A. JENKINS, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. The case proceeds on plaintiff’s claims that defendant Jenkins, an officer at Mule 19 Creek State Prison (MCSP), improperly searched plaintiff in violation of the Fourth and Eighth 20 Amendments and retaliated against him in violation of the First Amendment. See ECF No. 1 at 5- 21 6, 10; ECF…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
  3. Henry W. Kerr v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, John Van Geldern, Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. William Hunt v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Avila v. Willits Environmental Remediation TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API