(PC) Gosztyla v. Gruenwald
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD GOSZTYLA, No. 2:22-cv-1725 KJM CSK P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 E. GRUENWALD, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff’s fully briefed motion to compel 18 discovery is before the court. (ECF No. 34.) As set forth below, the motion is granted in part. 19 Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint 20 In his amended complaint, plaintiff alleges that defendant Gruenwald interfered with 21 plaintiff’s access to the courts, impeding his civil rights litigation, as well as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
- Henry W. Kerr v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, John Van Geldern, Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- William Hunt v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Avila v. Willits Environmental Remediation TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.