Legal Opinion

Concord Apartment House Co. v. O'Brien

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 8, 1906No. Gen. No. 12,605PublishedCited by 4 opinions

. Intervening petition. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Theodobe Bbentaito, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1905.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holdom

Having in view Sedgwick v. Concord Apartment House Co., 104 Ill. App. 5, it only remains for this court to now determine whether the proof in the record, when tested by legal principles applicable to it, sustains the decree.

It is apparent that the written contract of May 28, 1895, between appellant and W. D. O’Brien, as enlarged by the following indorsement thereon in writing: “December 21, 1895. We hereby agree to pay said first party the additional sum of $1,500, same being for increased cost of material to be used in the building.” Signed, “The Concord Apartment House Company,

By Cabl…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Downey v. O'DonnellIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Arnold v. BourniqueIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Kendall v. FaderIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Lull v. KorfIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Sedgwick v. Concord Apartment House Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Holm v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Elder Mercantile Co. v. Ottawa Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Carson Payson Co. v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Burgoyne v. PyleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API