Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Bournique

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1893PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Theodore Brentano, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Craig

This was an action of assumpsit brought by Arnold &. Taggart, appellants, against Augustus E. Bournique to recover a balance claimed to be due on a building contract, executed by the parties on the 1st day of March, 1883. On the trial in the Circuit Court, after the plaintiffs had closed their testimony, on motion of the defendant, the court instructed the jury to find for the defendant. Under the instruction a verdict was returned for defendant, upon which the court entered a judgment which, on appeal, was affirmed in the Appellate Court. In order to determine whether the court erred in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Michaelis v. WolfIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Hunt v. DivineIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  3. McAuley v. CarterIllinois Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Concord Apartment House Co. v. O'BrienIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Crane Elevator Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1897
  3. Korbly v. LoomisIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. White v. MitchellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. R.W. Dunteman Co. v. Village of LombardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API