Legal Opinion

Kavanaugh v. Taylor

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 1, 1891No. 249PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Erom the Elkhart Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.

The overruling of appellants’ motion for a new trial is the only 'error assigned. The reasons assigned for a new trial are numerous, and we will notice such as are argued in appellants’ brief as we proceed. The action was by the appellee against the appellants for the wrongful conversion of a car-load of potatoes.

The cause was tried by a jury, who found for the plaintiff in the sum of $331.44. At the proper time the court instructed the jury as follows :

“ The undisputed evidence shows that the plaintiff, in the fall of 1887, consigned a car-load of potatoes to one David Carpenter, at Elkhart,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miller v. White River School TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Friedline v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Tea v. GatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Meikel v. GreeneIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shaver Motors, Inc. v. Mills (In Re Mills)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1988
  2. Bryson v. Crown Oil Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Bottema v. PRODUCERS LIVESTOCK ASSN.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Nickey v. ZonkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Chicago Furniture Co. v. CronkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API