Legal Opinion

Brown v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 31, 2001No. 96C-13583; A100035PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Appellant petitions for reconsideration of our decision affirming the dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. 176 Or App 169, 31 P3d 453 (2001). We affirmed without discussion, citing Weidner v. Armenakis, 154 Or App 12, 959 P2d 623 (1998), withdrawn by order July 13, 1998, reasoning reaffirmed and readopted in Merrill v. Johnson, 155 Or App 295, 964 P2d 284, rev den 328 Or 40 (1998). Appellant contends that our disposition of his case is inconsistent with Christenson v. Thompson, 176 Or App 54, 31 P3d 449 (2001), and Newcomb v. Thompson, 176 Or App 167, 33 P3d 319 (2001),…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weidner v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Merrill v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Christenson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. Newcomb v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Brown v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gilbert C. Brown v. Joan Palmateer, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Gilbert C. Brown v. Joan Palmateer, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API