Legal Opinion
Save the Peaks Coalition v. United States Forest Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 9, 2012No. 10-17896PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
This case represents a gross abuse of the judicial process. Just when Defendants-Appellees United States Forest Service and Joseph P. Stringer (USFS), and Intervenor-Defendant Arizona Snowbowl Resort Limited Partnership (ASRLP) had successfully defended an agency decision to allow snowmaking at a ski resort on federal land all the way to the United States Supreme Court, “new” plaintiffs appeared. Represented by the same attorney as the losing parties in the first lawsuit, the “new” plaintiffs — who had closely monitored and, in some cases, actively encouraged…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Smith v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Vineberg v. BissonnetteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Nancy Walsh v. Nevada Department of Human Resources, Division of Healthcare, Finance and Policy State of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Navajo Nation v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Epic v. Ann CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Webster v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Protect Our Communities Foundation v. JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Sierra Club v. EPACourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- San Diego Navy Broadway Complex Coalition v. United States Department of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.