Legal Opinion

Epic v. Ann Carlson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 3, 2020No. 19-17479PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION No. 19-17479 INFORMATION CENTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-06643- v. EMC ANN CARLSON, in her official capacity as the Forest Supervisor of OPINION the Mendocino National Forest; UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, Defendants-Appellees, SIERRA PACIFIC INDUSTRIES, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted May 27, 2020 San Francisco, California Filed August 3,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Manuel De Jesus Ortega Melendr v. Joseph M. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. State of California v. the Little Sisters of the PoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Mark Baird v. Rob BontaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  2. Simon v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
  3. Apache Stronghold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  4. Friends of the Inyo v. UsfsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  5. Earth Island Institute v. Cicely MuldoonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API