Legal Opinion

Kalamazoo Oil Co. v. Boerman

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 3, 2000No. Docket 213943PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoekstra, J.

John Boerman (hereafter defendant) appeals as of right from an order entered by the trial court based on a jury’s finding that he owed damages to plaintiff. Before the jury trial, the trial court, as a discovery sanction, entered a default against defendant with respect to liability. On appeal, defendant claims that the trial court erred in denying him the opportunity to present to the jury evidence of plaintiffs alleged comparative negligence, in entering the default as a discovery sanction, and in prohibiting him from testifying and from calling other witnesses during the jury trial. We…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. People v. LukityMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Placek v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Wood v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Riddle v. McLouth Steel Products Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Jennings v. SouthwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Tropf v. Fidelity National Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  2. Hardrick v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Reed Estate v. ReedMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Calise v. Hidden Valley Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  5. Kasishke v. Frank (In Re Frank)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API