Legal Opinion
Nash Engineering Co. v. Trane Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 7, 1927No. 2508PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORTON, District Judge.
This is a suit for the infringement of three patents, viz. to Nash for displacement structure, No. 953,-222, dated March 29, 1910; to Nash for pump and air compressor, No. 1,091,529, dated March 31, 1914; and the reissue patent to Jennings, No. 15,637, dated June 26, 1923.
'It was heard at length in open court. At the conclusion of the arguments I gave an oral judgment, holding the first two patents valid and infringed. Decision on the Jennings patent was reserved. Subsequently, but before any decision had been made on the last patent, the defendant moved to reopen in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Keystone Manufacturing Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Western Electric Co. v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Mitchell v. TilghmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Trico Products Corporation v. Apco-Mossberg CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930
- Trane Co. v. Nash Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1928
- (PC) Brown v. ShafferDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (SS) Smith v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- I. P. Morris Corp. v. S. Morgan Smith Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.