Sisler v. Sapulpa Industrial Finance Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Per curiam
Tbe plaintiff in error was tbe defendant below and tbe defendant in error was tbe plaintiff below. Tbe parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant for tbe sake of convenience. Tbe plaintiff instituted its action in tbe court of common pleas, Tulsa county, Okla., to re-plevin a radio of tbe alleged value of $432, claiming a special ownership in said radio ¡by virtue of. a conditional sales contract, of which plaintiff was tbe assignee. Tbe defendant answered by way of general denial, and further answering, denied that plaintiff was the owner and bolder of tbe conditional sales…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Myers v. HubbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Robinson v. Peru Plow & Wheel Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1893
- Nolan v. SchaetzelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Amons v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Seattle-First National Bank v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1985
- Selected Investments Corporation v. LesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958