Legal Opinion
State v. Gardner
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided June 14, 2007No. File CR-04-0576812PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtMullarkey, J.
The defendant, Everton Gardner, moves to suppress statements made by the defendant to Detective Robert Davis on September 28, 2003, at Hartford Hospital. The defendant claims that the waiver of his Miranda 1 rights was not voluntary due to pain medication that he was given prior to speaking with Davis. After a full consideration, this court finds that the claims of the defendant fail and denies the defendant’s motion to suppress.
I
FACTS
This court conducted an evidentiary hearing on February 9, 2007. Based on the testimony and evidence introduced at that hearing, this court finds the following…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Campfield v. Stickman, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. ShifflettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010