Legal Opinion

Kidd v. McCanless

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1956PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swepston

This is an appeal by the Attorney G-eneral from a decree overruling certain grounds of appellants’ demurrer to the original bill, and declaring that the legislation providing for the apportionment of Senators and Representatives in the G-eneral Assembly, the same being Chapter 122 of the Public Acts of 1901, as amended, now codified as Sections 3-101 ét seq. of Tennessee Code Annotated, has expired and is no longer effective.

The ultimate question involved is obviously of great public importance, and we have given the same -the study to which the question is entitled. Examination of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smiley v. HolmSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. State ex rel. Attorney General v. CunningamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Ekern v. McGovernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Maryland Theatrical Corp. v. BrennanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  5. Ridout v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Scott v. GermanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Deane Hill Country Club, Inc. v. City of Knoxville and George F. McCanless Attorney General of TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  4. Maryland Committee for Fair Representation v. Tawes, Governor & Board of State CanvassersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  5. Brown v. State Election Board of the OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API