Sims v. Frink
District Court, M.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.. In the order setting for a hearing plaintiffs’ application for interlocutory injunction, we expressed the view that Section 2284 of Title 28 United States Code placed upon this Court the manda tory duty to set the application for a hearing “at the earliest practicable day.” The same principle, together with the importance of the case and the necessity for some effective action within a limited time, requires an early announcement of our views.
We remain of the same opinion that was expressed in the order setting the application for hearing, viz.: until the Legislature has had a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
3Cited by29 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Toombs v. FortsonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1962
- Sims v. FrinkDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1962
- Baker v. CarrDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1962
- Moss v. BurkhartDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1962
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.